<div dir="ltr"><br>2008/8/29 Stephen Sinclair <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:radarsat1@gmail.com">radarsat1@gmail.com</a>></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br></div>Actually you might find that a good place to discuss the Sitar model<br>
is on the STK mailing list, which is where it comes from.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br>Ah. But does that version print to the screen as well? I suppose the real issue is verifying the frequency we ask it to use is within range so with regard to the fix the performance-wrecking error messages may not be a real issue. I may look into this route.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
</div>Thanks Kas, I want to be clear that I share the same sentiment. Sorry<br>
if I come off being utilitarian in my communications sometimes, but I<br>
am usually just trying to be efficient. Obviously I think ChucK is a<br>
really cool idea and totally respect Ge for making it happen. But yes,<br>
I would love some communication and perhaps slightly more informative<br>
commit comments sometimes, too. ;-)<br>
</blockquote><div><br>I thought your sentiments were quite clear and your message "sounded" friendly to me, I just went a step further (or more general) so I wanted to be a 100% clear. It's not my place to tell anybody how to spend his/her time but I still wanted to comment on what's going on and how I think it could be improved (for everybody, I'm actually hoping for this to save Ge time).<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
I want to avoid situations where two people end up trying to solve the<br>
same problem, for example, stepping on each other's toes. For<br>
example, right now I have no idea, someone at Princeton or Stanford<br>
could already be working hard on the 64-bit problem and is totally<br>
annoyed by my patch, but I have no way of knowing this.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Yes, I agree. This is a important issue. Not just here but also with things like Maudi trying to improve the Mini's interface and add to it.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm actually fine with the idea of Ge not wanting to work with a<br>
larger base of developers, I'm okay with that, but the main reason I<br>
keep persisting is that he's said himself that he is interested in<br>
contributions.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Yes, it says so in the "TODO" file;<br><br>"too many to name. Need more developers. Thanks." This line has been there since the dawn of "now" as far as I know. Also; "working on ChucK" is used as a teaching device at Princeton (likely Stanford as well?)... <br>
<br>I think it's mainly the procedure that's unclear, I suspect. Of course it would be quite ChucKian for there not to be any set procedure at all....<br><br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br></div></div><br></div>