<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Sep 18, 2015, at 8:20 AM, Spencer Salazar wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">Thats correct- SinOsc is just a naive implementation of a sine wave. I don't know that there is a reason for this other than simplicity. </span></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>Hello chuck list</div><div><br></div><div>this is relating to the sine wave, perhaps a good moment to share this</div><div>I have spent quite some time working with what I call a circular wave , which is like a sine wave. It is based on an ancient parametrization of the unit circle ( from pythagorean triples ) and the algebra of complex numbers. It all comes from ideas by mathematician NJ Wildberger.</div><div>To be really efficient this needs implementation on lower level, but I myself do not have a background in computer science . I just updated the pdf to include homogeneous coordinates. If anyone ever goes further with this I would be curious to hear about it. There is an email in the pdf</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://antidelusionmechanism.org/files/CircularWave.pdf">http://antidelusionmechanism.org/files/CircularWave.pdf</a></div><div><br></div><div>much greetings</div><div>Vilbjørg</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>