It just occured to me that theoretically a automated system to update code to the new syntax could break stuff. I think this;<br><br>sinosc SinOsc => dac;<br><br>would (theoretically) be valid in the old system while bluntly converting this to;
<br><br>SinOsc Sinosc => dac;<br><br>would result in problems.<br><br>I hope nobody used that as a convention. I could imagine people being inspirered by examples that use uppercase for classes and lowercase for instances and start using the following in new-style files;
<br><br>SndBuf sndbuf => dac;<br><br>I think I myself did that in a few cases; a script would break that.<br><br>This means it's probaly advisable to keep a manual eye (erm....) on exactly what's being converted into what and not to blutly convert everything -including new-style files- system-wide, then have more problems then you had to begin with.
<br><br>To be clear; I don't mean to say it's not a good idea to use batch-conversion or that it wasn't very nice of Stephen to make us a script :-).<br><br>It'd be sad to have to say "I thought of that" after somebody accidentally converted a few hundred unsorted files....
<br><br><br>Kas.