<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/13/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">dan trueman</b> <<a href="mailto:dtrueman@princeton.edu">dtrueman@princeton.edu</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="">look for this in the next release:<div><br></div><br><br><div><span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>lisa.valueAt(buf.valueAt(i), i * 1::samp);</div></div></blockquote><div><br><br>Looks very good! Would it be possible to also support this;
<br><br><div>buf.valueAt(i) =><span style="white-space: pre;"> </span>lisa.valueAt( i::samp);</div><br>
or is that a given already? This second example looks slightly more ChucKian to me. Ge?<br><br>Also, is LiSa interpolating? Or will we be required to specify a integer number of samples? Or will it round? Forcing integers wouldn't have to be a problem because for a arbitrary duration D we could go like this;
<br>(D / samp $ int)::samp<br><br>But that could be a question here.<br><br>Thanks for taking the time to do this, I look forward to morphing buffers already!<br><br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br></div></div>