On 19/04/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">lucas samaruga</b> <<a href="mailto:samarugalucas@gmail.com">samarugalucas@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi list</blockquote><div><br>Hi Lucas!<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I'm working with ChucK in a musical project,</blockquote>
<div><br>Yay! A wise choice too, much better then ChucK for database management, probably. :¬)<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
and I have a problem with the code.<br>This code generates 3 different error menssages in my machine<br>(running chuck-alsa on linux), depending on the amount of<br>
components in an array.</blockquote><div><br>I just glanced over it but I suspect at least issue 2) is one of the (new?) issues where (un)certain problems of resolving type on arrays (maybe especially when using functions) leads to seg-faults.<br>
<br>There's good news in that Ge is looking into this and I found so far that in all cases where I ran into this (if it's the same thing) so far we can write around it.<br><br>Another thing worth mentioning is that ChucK shouldn't seg-fault at all. Maybe it should kill the shred when the error happens or give a error at compilation but not seg-fault and quite working altogether.<br>
<br>It's rather late here and your comments are in a language I don't speak (I think Spanish?) so I hope you'll excuse me if I don't have a solution right away but that issue is likely to be fixed relatively soon and I rate suspect we could work around it as well. Just not right now :¬)<br>
</div><br></div><br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br>