<div dir="ltr"><br>mike clemow;<br><br>>I wanted to write a class that would abstract arrays like the<br>
Collection class in SuperCollider. I guess I can't. I would have to<br>
write a class for each type of object that I wanted to make<br>
Collections of.<br><br>I think you are right.<br><br>I'd like a way to address arrays because there are many things one might like to do to arrays that don't depend on the type; removing a object, inserting one, randomising or reversing the order of the locations, etc, and right now you can't.<br>
<br>The same goes for Ugens, it might be nice to be able to reason about those in a more abstract way, for example to re-connect them yet I don't think you can write a function that takes something of type "Ugen" as a argument or returns one.<br>
<br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br></div>