<div dir="ltr">Stephen Sinclair;<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I don't use it (emacs ftw!)</blockquote>
<div><br>Would you have the time to share some of your thoughts on the advantages of emacs for ChucKing? I looked at it but it's quite a daunting editor and I'd like to know a bit about the potential gains before investing time in it.<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> but I just tried to compile it quickly and<br>
it failed, so I can't help directly.</blockquote><div><br>Hmmm. I found the Mini quite easy to compile, at least since there is a clear list of all that you need for it, on top of ChucK's dependencies. I just wish it would have a more intelligent "replace" function for shreds then always replacing the last one that was run. It's nice and simple, I like that. There are hotkeys for running code though not enough for editing it. emacs will solve all of those issues, I'm sure but that would go at the expense of the simplicity?<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
However, just wanted to mention that I bet it would be pretty easy to<br>
quickly write a little shell script to monitor files in a folder and<br>
spit them to a printer (through a postscript filter or even latex<br>
maybe), so you could just save your files into that folder and they'd<br>
print.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>This sounds do-able, yes, Perhaps that's the method for me if I do decide to go through with this.<br><br>Thanks!<br>Kas.<br></div></div><br></div>