<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="Ih2E3d">
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:06 AM, AlgoMantra <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:algomantra@gmail.com" target="_blank">algomantra@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div>Well, multiplicity of options should be available, for the simple reason that...well, lets say I am in India,<br></div>but Arduino was designed in Italy, so there is a good chance that some key component will not be readily<br>
or cheaply available to me here (India). </div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Surely the chances of being able to find compatible components generally decreases proportional to </div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>the number of different standards. </div>
</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>Ah, but that's also a question of semantics, viz. what is a design apropos a standard? There are various Arduino clones,<br>not just one - so they would fall under the same standard I suppose. I guess you do have a point though. <br>
<br>------- -.-<br>1/f ))) --.<br>------- ...<br><a href="http://www.algomantra.com">http://www.algomantra.com</a><br>
</div>