<div dir="ltr">What? Ritchie Hawtin doesn't use ChucK?!<div><br></div><div>Why weren't we told about this sooner?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Kassen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:signal.automatique@gmail.com">signal.automatique@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="ltr"><br>I hope this guy (or gall) writes more on this subject, (s)he seems quite insightfull to me. Personally I've been "wanking my stick" while fantasising about music quite a lot, I even got to write a small text about it; <a href="http://leonardo.info/lmj/lmj18contribnotes.html" target="_blank">http://leonardo.info/lmj/lmj18contribnotes.html</a> (scroll down or search for my name). It's great! I wouldn't have it any other way. typically in the spur of the moment I don't love it, that comes with time or trusting in feedback but I don't see a problem with that, that seems borderline universal in artists.<br>
</div></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>Well, la-di-da, Mr "I've contributed to a well respected journal". Bet you went to university, too. Your sort make me sick.</div><div><br></div><div>;-)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Seriously, though; this guy writes 'music AI' software and then resents it when people think that implies he might be interested in other experimental computer music programmes... well, I guess for his purposes it's good that his software revolves around a particular networking protocol... ChucK seems more concerned with time, which many of us find useful, but that must be because we've lost track of what music is about...</div>
</div></div>