<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/7/17 mike clemow <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gelfmuse@gmail.com">gelfmuse@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
FWIW, I really want to use LiCK, but I haven't found the time to dig in yet...<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Same here.<br><br>I could indeed see a use for a library object that would provide various kinds of randomness. Particularly things like standard normal distributions would be useful, for example in controlling grains. That would be one kind of noise that's not yet covered by the build in tools and that's general enough to be universally useful, unlike things like chaotic functions or random walks that seem -to me- top be too specific. <br>
</div></div><br>I could also imagine how a emulation of dice (with the sort of notation used in tabletop roleplaying games) could be useful as a intuitive way of expressing ranges and distributions for impulsive usage like livecoding. Then again, maybe I'm just exposing myself as a nerd here...<br>
<br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br>