<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>How about </div><div> likely(n)</div><div>... where 0 <= n <= 1.0, which will return true with a probability of n. Even better, just make n an optional arg to maybe(). <br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Kassen <<a href="mailto:signal.automatique@gmail.com">signal.automatique@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/3 Rebecca Fiebrink <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fiebrink@princeton.edu"><a href="mailto:fiebrink@princeton.edu">fiebrink@princeton.edu</a></a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">OR, because it's chuck and therefore more fun than your average language:<div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ok, that's it. </div><div><br></div><div>Let's have "probably" and "perhaps" at 75% and 25% as well. Everyone loves "maybe" so much, we might as well have more of it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Does English have single words describing indeterminate times and/or durations that aren't already reserved or would be confusing? We talk about "in a bit" or "in a while" but those sound like they would be cause for confusion. "soon" might be a good one?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Kas.</div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>chuck-users mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu">chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users">https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>