<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
> This licence thing is a very tuff subject, indeed! I wish the world were<br>
> easier!!<br>
<br>
</div>I think it actually makes it as easy as it will get. Licences give you<br>
extra options. Sure; options under certain conditions, but they are<br>
options that would not otherwise be there.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>indeed.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
> ----- A*bit of OT*-----*<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, sorry for talking about SC here.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
> I must say your point of view of Supercollider is completed*mistaken.<br>
<div class="im">> Its not cause most of the code you find is ugly, that the language is<br>
> ugly.<br>
> Actually from all the languages you were able to link in your email,<br>
> SuperCollider is probably the one that lets you do the most beautiful<br>
> code, its all about how capable you're.<br>
<br>
</div>Sorry, you lost me for a moment. Did I say that? SC took a bit of a<br>
"kitchen-sink" approach to syntax; giving many options for many<br>
things. That -I am sure- is really cool if you'd like to write<br>
"poetry" in it,</blockquote><div><br></div><div>yeah my goal is always to write beautiful poems. and am sure if you're a coder that is able to write readable code, supercollider will allow you more than one way to do that. bad for beginners, great for coders.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I remember when i started chuck everything simply work - i was very impressed - everything was super accurate, was the oposite of my beginning with supercollider where i barely new if i was dealing with BEATS / MINUTES / SECS.</div>
<div><br></div><div>But after a few weeks ( ok, not a few, some weeks ) i got my head around it, and now i know how to do accurate and not accurate clocking :P</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I also gather it can be confusing if you are a novice<br>
and would like to find the common ground between 5 examples by<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yeah that sucks big time, the documentation weren't very friendly until few versions ago.</div><div><br></div><div>Supercollider learning curve is definitely bigger ( way bigger ) than chuck, in the other hand there's way more documentation to be read and way more code to be used.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
different authors. It does take a lot more from functional programming<br>
which I agree often leads to beautiful code. Then again I find a<br>
certain beauty in ChucK's tendency to be straightforward and sometimes<br>
a bit blunt too.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I really love chuck, and i think the way it makes possible to create and re-chain channel strips is a must! super sexy! loads of claps for chuck!</div><div><br></div><div>
The only problem for me was when i started creating my classes and dealing with events i started having some limitations which lead me to come back to supercollider, where classes, inheritance and other syntax things gives my extremely OO ideas a better housing.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Also the extensions in SC ( Quarks ) make it very easy to share code, maybe we should look on making something for chuck. </div><div><br></div><div>Something like "brew for chuck" ? Am sure a quick solution can be written using node.js + GIT</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">You can get ugly or beautiful in any language. I swear I even saw<br>
readable Perl once ;-)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Don't get me wrong, am with you ( completely with you )</div><div><br></div><div>And I think chuck is super sexy and i would love to keep chucking.</div><div>
<br></div><div>I would love to help on improving the syntax and OO, and all that jazz. But unfortunately i had to prioritise my idea over digging chuck source code.</div><div><br></div><div>Hopefully at some point i'll be able to convert my SC classes to chuck ( :</div>
<div><br></div><div>peace</div></div>