Re: [chuck-dev] feature request: ---

I like that alternative. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Spencer Salazar wrote:

I think being able to spork a block of code like this:

spork ~ { // some code }

spork ~ { // some other code }

would, to a lesser but still helpful degree, alleviate the issues this proposal is trying to address. It also has the benefit of recombining existing syntax rather than introducing new syntax.

spencer

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Tom Lieber wrote:

...

So you could write this:

TubeBell b => dac; --- while(40::ms => now) { 1 => b.noteOn; 1600::ms => now; 1 => b.noteOff; } --- do { Std.mtof(Std.rand2(0, 3) + 60) => b.freq; } while(1640::ms => now);

and have it work like this:

TubeBell b => dac;

fun void part1() { while(40::ms => now) { 1 => b.noteOn; 1600::ms => now; 1 => b.noteOff; } }

fun void part2() { do { Std.mtof(Std.rand2(0, 3) + 60) => b.freq; } while(1640::ms => now); }

spork ~ part1(); spork ~ part2(); day => now;

-- Tom Lieber http://AllTom.com/ http://infinite-sketchpad.com/

_______________________________________________ chuck-dev mailing list chuck-dev@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-dev

_______________________________________________ chuck-dev mailing list chuck-dev@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-dev

-- Tom Lieber http://AllTom.com/ http://infinite-sketchpad.com/