Re: [chuck-dev] Re: The ChucK Manual prerelease

Hi, I still don't have well-formed thoughts here. My preference is to have people people modify the cvs tree and send diffs or patches. I am assuming that people on the dev list have been accessing cvs anonymously if they haven't been given accounts. The manual is in doc/ manual/ It is all done in latex. As much as I would love to put it up on the wiki, it would take a lot of work to extract it and reformat it. Another issue. What is the wiki for? I am inclined to have the manual and html docs be for reference and the wiki be a place for people to post their patches and discuss bugs and workarounds and community- based things. I am very excited about having help and feedback on the docs. None of what I am saying is meant to poopoo any ideas, I just don't have time to do the convert and then manage the docs in three places... --art On 21-Nov-05, at 1:49 AM, Ge Wang wrote:

...

Adam Tindale writes:

...

I have been working on the manual for almost a year.

How about putting it on the wiki and let us all work on it?;).

I think this is a really great idea. Adam should probably lead the effort, if he wants. Thoughts? Adam? anyone else?

Best, Ge! _______________________________________________ chuck-dev mailing list chuck-dev@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-dev