November 2005 - chuck-users - lists.cs.princeton.edu

WvOut
by eduard 08 Nov '05

08 Nov '05

Could you give a quick example on how to use WvOut in order to write to a file? I have tried the following with no success, a part from having an empty "audio" file: WvOut waveOut; gain g; 0.9 =>g.gain; noise whitenoise; 0.5 => whitenoise.gain; "/CHUCK/samples/test.wav"=>waveOut.wavFilename; whitenoise => waveOut; whitenoise => dac; 2::second => now; waveOut.closeFile; whitenoise =< dac;

3 3

Re: WvOut
by Jim Hinds 08 Nov '05

08 Nov '05

I'd like to learn from Eduard's example of "not working." My conjecture is that the fan-out of the ugen whitenoise is only one, and that the last "chuck" operator (whitenoise => dac) un-chucks the previous line. That is, for a general ugen (or other chuckable object): fan-in == many; fan-out == 1. Yes? Jim Hinds > > From: eduard <eduard.aylon(a)gmail.com> > Date: November 8, 2005 1:28:57 AM HST > To: ChucK Users Mailing List <chuck-users(a)lists.cs.princeton.edu> > Subject: [chuck-users] WvOut > Reply-To: ChucK Users Mailing List <chuck- > users(a)lists.cs.princeton.edu> > > > Could you give a quick example on how to use WvOut in order to > write to a file? > I have tried the following with no success, a part from having an > empty "audio" file: > > WvOut waveOut; > gain g; > 0.9 =>g.gain; > noise whitenoise; > 0.5 => whitenoise.gain; > "/CHUCK/samples/test.wav"=>waveOut.wavFilename; > whitenoise => waveOut; > whitenoise => dac; > 2::second => now; > waveOut.closeFile; > whitenoise =< dac; > >

2 1

(no subject)
by andreas＠smartelectronix.com 05 Nov '05

05 Nov '05

Hey all, just started playing with the 'new' chuck...hmmm , fun:) now, i'm wondering, is it possible to get the contents of a directory (and loop thru all the file(name)s...)? i want to load a whole directory full of samples into an array of sndbuf's... thanks, regards -andreas

6 8

audicle question
by Ken 04 Nov '05

04 Nov '05

i read the .pdf about the audicle and a quick question i have about the user programmable face, will it be possible to create synth interfaces in opengl, and 3d graphics projection for vj projects within chuck? thanks, ken

2 1

RE: [chuck-users] include
by Robin Davies 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

There were remnants and vestiges of an "auto-include" feature in Chuck sources last time I looked. These looked fairly promising. I'm not sure what the original intent was -- it didn't seem to be terribly functional in the last set of sources I looked at, but the general intention seemed like a good idea. As I read it, the intention was to look for a matching source file for undefined classes and load the matching source file on demand. The complication, presumably, is that the class implementations have to be loaded in multiple steps: parse all declarations of auto-included files first, and then bind references in a separate pass, in order to avoid problems with circular references. The code for the multi-step binding seems to be mostly there too -- more there, than the auto-include flag, anyway. The basic idea seemed sound, and is somewhat better than providing a lexical include facility. > -----Original Message----- > From: chuck-users-bounces(a)lists.cs.princeton.edu [mailto:chuck-users- > bounces(a)lists.cs.princeton.edu] On Behalf Of Rasmus Kaj > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 2:16 PM > To: ChucK Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [chuck-users] include > > >>>>> "PD" == Philip Davidson <philipd(a)CS.Princeton.EDU> writes: > > PD> yes, but it's in development / testing phases. > > Ah, I should take a look at that, then ... Is it a "simple lexical" > include (like with the c preprocessor), or is it in a higher level, > (what I'd like to call require/provide, like in elisp), so that the > included code only needs to be compiled once? > > Basically, I'd like "require foo" to check (in a hash table) if foo > allready is provided, and in that case just return. If foo isn't > provided, it could search the load path for "foo.ck", and compile that > if found. > > This would be very simple given a global namespace for functions and > classes (so that the classes in foo is available for all shreds when > foo is required in one). Otherwise require would also have to include > the foo namespace into the current namespace. > > -- > Rasmus Kaj --+-- rasmus(a)kaj.se --+-- http://www.stacken.kth.se/~kaj/ > Det är alldeles för mycket sport inom idrotten > _______________________________________________ > chuck-users mailing list > chuck-users(a)lists.cs.princeton.edu > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

1 0

include
by Atte André Jensen 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

Is there an include or equivalent in chuck (Still thinking about how to modulize code)? -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk

3 3

emacs.el?
by Ken 01 Nov '05

01 Nov '05

i read somewhere that there is a chuck mode for emacs, but i can't seem o find it. does anyone have that available? thanks, ken

4 6