...and while we&#39;re at it;<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
//set lisa buffer size to sample size<br>
buf.samples() * 1::samp =&gt; lisa.duration;<br>
</blockquote><div><br>I tend to use;<br>buf.samples()::samp =&gt; lisa.duration; // I use this a lot<br><br>But that might be too compact for a file in the examples dir. Also good (and arguably more transparent) would be;<br>
<br>buf.samples() * samp =&gt; lisa.duration;<br><br>I know I&#39;m nit-picking here but I think we should strive for a maximum in clarity in the examples as those are probably the best resource there is for new ChucKists, particularly those not taking formal classes. Perhaps some people find the extra &quot;1::&quot; makes the line easier to understand but I&#39;m inclined to drop it.<br>
<br>There are a few more things scattered around the examples dir that could be confusing, some of them caused by some examples being older then various updates to ChucK. Is there a place where suggestions could go? One of the voice synthesis demos (a really nice one, sound-wise) gives errors while running, for example.<br>
</div></div><br>I don&#39;t intend to criticise anyone here (as it is it&#39;s a great resources), I mean to point out that /examples/ is likely the entry point for people who may join us so I&#39;d like it to be as welcoming, non-confusing and friendly as we can make it. I know I learned by copying and imitating structures found in the examples so I feel it should be easy to generalise based upon them.<br>
<br>I&#39;d be happy to go over the whole dir, as long as I don&#39;t have a deadline and there is some agreement that this would be worthwhile.<br><br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br>