On 10/22/07, dan trueman <dtrueman@princeton.edu> wrote:
well, that *would* be a cool way to do it! at the moment, it only
works with one voice (assuming the settings of voice 0) when
1=>track, but i'll look at it some more and see if we can do what you
suggest. should be possible. good idea!
but, you can already play with the current implementation; should be
in the release that is out there.
in the next release there will also be a 2=>track mode, where it
interprets the input as a duration value (or literal time point)
within the buffer. this will obviously override any individual voice
loop-point settings, so will only make sense with one voice, but it's
kind of nice to be able to think in terms of time instead of phase
sometimes.