Lucas;<span dir="ltr"></span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div style=""><div><font size="1" face="-webkit-monospace"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Hi</span></font></div>
<div><font size="1" face="-webkit-monospace"><span style="font-size: 16px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font size="1"><span style="font-family: -webkit-monospace; font-size: 16px;">This kind of things seem to be due to a lack of development in documentation and/or language.</span></font></div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>In this case I suppose the issue is with a disagreement on what proper behaviour is. I&#39;d rather have a open discussion about that than have everything determined by a language specification. When the language specification was written we all had far less of a coherent idea of what ChucK was or should be than we now do.<br>
</div></div><br>I might still have posted about this if the specifications explicitly demanded the current behaviour without a explanation of *why* it is this way.<br><br>I suppose I agree with you but discussions like this will lead to developments and specifications. I might go as far as saying there will be little development if we don&#39;t debate.<br>
<br>Yours,<br>Kas.<br>