Re: [chuck-users] Newbie envelope glide confusion

Perry; Envelope e => blah;

2.0 => e.target;

This has bitten me more than once.

Me too. Once I need shots.

I think a great default behavior for an envelope that has nothing chucked into it would be to yield its current value

I feel the same way but thought I would be the only one to want this. I did suggest this to a friend who is contemplating designing a analogue envelope module. The one good thing here is that I tend to call the Step "unity" (for unity-gain) and I get to write; true => unity.next; ...that has to be one of the friendliest looking lines of code ever.

I'll try to remember to lobby to get this folded into a future version of ChucK.

+1 vote. Kas.