Re: [chuck-users] fun dur GetT() rises to invalid type

Hi all, On Dec 15, 2005, at 8:59 PM, Spencer Salazar wrote:

it seems that the :: operator has precedence over the . operator (or they have the same precedence and are evaluated left to right), so

Yeah right on. (:: has the same precedence as .) The precedence of :: has been brought into question before: https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck/2005-February/ 000210.html Perhaps it's time to modify this. For now, we have boosted . precedence over :: (now in CVS). Thoughts? Best, Ge!