13 Oct
2007
13 Oct
'07
5:39 a.m.
On 10/13/07, dan trueman
look for this in the next release:
lisa.valueAt(buf.valueAt(i), i * 1::samp);
Looks very good! Would it be possible to also support this; buf.valueAt(i) => lisa.valueAt( i::samp); or is that a given already? This second example looks slightly more ChucKian to me. Ge? Also, is LiSa interpolating? Or will we be required to specify a integer number of samples? Or will it round? Forcing integers wouldn't have to be a problem because for a arbitrary duration D we could go like this; (D / samp $ int)::samp But that could be a question here. Thanks for taking the time to do this, I look forward to morphing buffers already! Yours, Kas.