Hey Kassen-<div>Thanks for the quick reply ...<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
I think the shell has been close to abandoned, <br></blockquote><div>That is a bummer. I kinda had a feeling that might be the case. I guess that is why I inquired.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<br>
I think the Mini mostly replaced it; it does all that the shell does<br>
and more though of course it does need to be used with a Gui; that<br>
might be a downside to some.<br></blockquote><div> </div><div>I like the Mini but I really like Vim. That is really the only reason I use the shell.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

Personally I tried to use the shell for a while but I found it a bit<br>
clumsy so I&#39;m curious why and how you use it.<br></blockquote><div> </div><div> I mainly edit .ck files in Vim in one window and then run &#39;chuck --shell&#39; in another window to add and remove shreds and occasionally call a method from a public class to change tempo or key globally. Nothing that couldn&#39;t be done in the Mini.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Those abandoned shell plans you mention sound awesome. I hope someday (maybe with more and more people live coding) the shell becomes a priority again. </div><div>Thanks.</div><div>Later.</div><div>K </div>
</div></div>