Stephen;

In the Shaker's setupNum() function (uget_stk.cpp:12387), the
frequencies of each resonator are set depending on the instrument
type.  It looks like they are set to specific values depending on the
instrument.  This is probably because they are designed to emulate
very specific sounds.

Yes, that side to it I understood. It seems the underlying code is relatively complex because the character of the different emulations (for example the number of partials) varies quite a bit. It's a nice and versatile UGen, I like it.
 

You could probably get some interesting effects if you modified this
code to multiply all frequencies by a variable such as freq, so that
you'd have control over it at runtime.  But the answer is, I think in
generate .freq() is not used for Shakers.

Ok, yes. for some of the presets, like the pebbles, tuning would make relatively little sense and I can see how this could be the case. For others, like the bamboo, I'm getting the impression like they *are* supposed to be suitable for more melodic/tuned applications. I'd imagine that the tuned bamboo is supposed to be capable of being a part of a anklung (sp?) or similar instrument that's based on both particle behaviour *and* tuning.

In any case; the docs do state that .freq() does work so either the docs or .freq() will have to change to line the two up. Personally I'd prefer tuned particles over a extra line in the manual/reference but admittedly that option is far more work.... :¬). BTW, I just looked up the speciffic example for this UGen in /examples/stk/ and in line 21 of "shake-o-matic.ck" the frequency *is* being set, though that might be a plain mistake, of course.

Perhaps Perry or Gary will have some time to comment on the intended behaviour? There are quite a few exceptions for ChucK in the code so I could even imagine this functionality differes between the plain STK and it's ChucKist child by accident. I can well see your case here but I'm not abandoning all hope for (cheap & easy) tuned rain and anklungs :¬).

Yours,
Kas.