16 Mar
2009
16 Mar
'09
12:21 a.m.
BTW, Gen17 has the exact same issue and here the docs point out; // sounds better not going to extremes drive.gain( 0.99 ); Which makes me believe this was known, maybe even intentional, however no mention is made of the differing behaviour between the UGen based scanning and code-based indexing and I'm not sure I see the use. Here it gets a bit mysterious to me. Yours, Kas.