if (i%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain;which is not the same asif (now%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain;because I don't think "now" increments at the same rate as i (I wonder if now increments one sample at a time, rather than .1 ms at a time, then they become equivalent, thus your fix.). Anyway, not sure--haveto try this at home.Cheers,Charlie
Send chuck-users mailing list submissions to
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
chuck-users-request@lists.cs.princeton.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
chuck-users-owner@lists.cs.princeton.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of chuck-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: two similar shreds with different results (Casper Schipper)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Casper Schipper <casper.schipper@gmail.com>
To: ChucK Users Mailing List <chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:31:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [chuck-users] two similar shreds with different results_______________________________________________Hi Charlie,I think I found it: .1::ms is not the same as 1::sampYou do in both scripts .1 ::ms => now, but in the second variant, this means now will have increased by 4.1 samples, instead of 1 unit (depending on your samplerate).I could get the same sound from both scripts by changing .1::ms => now to samp => now;Best,CasperOn 27 Jan 2019, at 14:58, Charlie <taos.points@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________Hey folks, I'm puzzled why these two shreds don't make the same sound. I created a simple bit crusher using an integer as an index and then using time as an index; I thought these were equivalent but they aren't. I wonder if this is because the integer increments at a different rate than the sampling rate? Any guidance on this gratefully received! Thanks,CharlieFirst shred://---------------------------------------------SinOsc s => dac;110 => s.freq;0 => int i;250 => int iMax;0 => int jCount;while (true) {i++;// if (i%130 == 0 || i%201 ==0 || i% 737 == 0) 0 =>s.gain;if (i%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain;jCount++;if (jCount > iMax) 0 => jCount;// 1::samp => now;.1::ms => now;1 => s.gain;}//---------------------------------------------second shred://---------------------------------------------SinOsc s => dac;110 => s.freq;0::samp => dur jMin;250::samp => dur iMax;0::samp => dur jCount;1::samp => dur jDelta;while (true) {if (now%iMax > jCount ) 0.0 =>s.gain;jCount+jDelta => jCount;if (jCount > iMax) jMin => jCount;.1::ms => now;1 => s.gain;}//---------------------------------------------
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users