Mhh, I was even using static string references directly:
https://github.com/rhaberkorn/digitale-debutanten/blob/master/lib/SampOsc.ck...
turns out, I submitted a patch for this last year...
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-dev/2012-September/000443.htm...
So if you're using the latest version, the patch still isn't upstream.
2013/10/23 Robin Haberkorn
Hi!
If I recall correctly, this was indeed a bug in ChucK's codebase, but it's been a while since I looked at it.
As a workaround you may do the following:
public class A { static string @a[]; } ["Hello world"] @=> A.a;
Then you should be able to access the string as A.a[0] since member "a" will be an array reference (which is not considered primitive). I've used such static string arrays in my code.
Also wrapping the string in a class (or even deriving from string?) may work.
Best regards, Robin
2013/10/22 Kiran O.V.
: Hi
When I click 'add shred' with the following code:
public class A { static string a; }
it throws following message:
[*unnamed1]:line(3): cannot declare static non-primitive objects (yet)... [*unnamed1]:line(3): ...(hint: declare as ref (@) & initialize outside for now)
as if string is non-primitive.
And when I follow the suggestion and use a ref
public class A { static string @ a; }
it throws the following message:
[*unnamed1]:line(3): cannot declare references (@) of primitive type 'string'... [*unnamed1]:line(3): ...(primitive types: 'int', 'float', 'time', 'dur')
as if string is a primitive type.
Is it a code limitation or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance!
Kiran
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users