ons 2007-10-31 klockan 02:13 +0100 skrev eduard aylon:
Excuseme I didn't quite understand you cause I didn't know anyone was working on it and I now see you've been doing some work there. I think they both do sort of the same.
I'll keep myself updated on that link,
Well, actually, your seems to have just a tiny bit more features than the one currently on the wiki, and you seems to know what you're doing (I'm just copying and modifying blindly), so I think you should replace the one on the wiki with this one. If you want to. I'm attaching a new version of the one you sent in your first post, but with added support for the new "<--"-comments (line 126 and 129), and highlighting for +=>, and similar (however, it's also highlighting +=^. Is this correct, kassen, spencer, ge?) (line 187). One thing, though: For the markup of the complex numbers I'm using this regex: "\(%\|#\)\ze(". That'll make the # or % coloured if it's followed by a "(" (which is uncoloured). This makes the highlight look like the example-code in Perry, Ge and Rebeccas paper http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/publications/uana_icmc2007.pdf . What do you think? Cheers, Gasten