I want to encourage their development as well.
ChucK has something that no other environment has, the ability to jump from one level to another without time constraints of architecture. Which I find very interesting.
Regards
Lucas

2010/5/5 Ge Wang <ge@ccrma.stanford.edu>
Greetings Thomas!

Thanks for the encouraging feedback!  ChucK is definitely alive, kicking, crashing, and growing!  We need to restructure our dev process to be better, but we are as committed as ever.

Keep on ChucKin'!

Ge!

~~~
Ge Wang
Assistant Professor
Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA)
Stanford University
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~ge/
~
Co-founder, CTO, Chief Creative Officer
Smule
http://www.smule.com/ | http://twitter.com/gewang
~~~


On Wed, 5 May 2010, Thomas Girod wrote:

Hi there.

I'm currently making a small app using ChucK, and I find this language
marvelous - truly, I find it much easier to get things done with ChucK
than with SuperCollider.

But at the same time, it's pretty obvious that the language still have
a few caveats, stuff that is not implemented yet. Looking at the dev
list, I can see there isn't much activity around this project anymore.

So, is the project dying ?

T

_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users