Hey, Luca.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I work as a developer<br>
for noise related applications (in particular we manage aircraft noise<br>
and in general noise pollution).<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Very interesting!</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
   1. Do you think that ChucK could be a profitable choice to have this<br>
      job done?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Let me get this straight; you would like to analyse a signal for things like amplitude, RMS power and spectral distribution, possibly compensating for the sensitivity of hearing so you can determine whether you need sound-proofing and if so of what kind?</div>
<div><br></div><div>If so then yes; I would say that could be done. One big issue for applications like yours, where there will be regulations, will be calibrating the whole system (mic, pre-amp, analysis, analysis display) but that is a issue that is quite universal in that field.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I think ChucK would be a better choice for this than PD, I&#39;m not sure how it would compare to Faust.</div><div><br></div><div>Yours,</div><div>Kas.</div></div>