Re: [chuck-users] current bug summary (partial, obviously)

On 6/28/06, Atte André Jensen wrote:

This reminds me: what's the CVS policy (not asking for guarentees!)? Would it make sense at all (for me) to grab from cvs and actually expect to 1) compile it 2) use it 3) trust it (probably not)?

Would the "snapshot" one be a compromise? I have that one because it fixed a issue I had with functions that took a array, manipulated it then crashed the VM. That one seems dependable to me at least; I didn't see it crash in a way that wasn't clearly my own fault yet. Kas.