Re: [chuck-users] chuck posibilities at sample level

Rob;

As an aside: which version of ChucK are you using? I ask because I've been bitten by a bug (documented in the archives) where the event mechanism appears to truncate sub-sample times to an integer sample. I'm wondering if that's been fixed.

I believe that bug is still in there. BTW, I also believe that "sample accurate" could be seen to mean both interpretations that Stephen gave; I think both are valid and ChucK supports both. By that I mean ChucK's specs do, as Rob rightly points out there are issues with that in practice in the form of this bug. Yours, Kas.