On 8/29/07, Martin Ahnelöv <operagasten@gmail.com> wrote:
ons 2007-08-29 klockan 18:40 +0200 skrev Kassen:
>
>
> On 8/29/07, Martin Ahnelöv <operagasten@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You should be able to $ chuck + foo bar - 1 2 3 = 4 foobar.
> Nuff said.
>
> Could you perhaps still say a little more? I don't understand this at
> all, I fear.
I mean that I would like to add teo new shreds, remove 3, and replace
one with another file in the same go, to get the "emotial effect" that I
I'm seeking. It could be used to change from verse to refrain in a
popsong, for example.
Yes, I see now. I was completely confused, I had asumed the dollar sign meant you wanted to cast a variable called "chuck" to.... and there I lost track. My oops.
I agree that more versatility there would help a lot, particularly where the MiniAudicle is concerned and a graphical interface could make it all even easier. One thing I'd like is the ability to update some code, then replace all shreds that came from that window/file in one swoop instead of just one.
Sure, but chuck have never accepted any numbers of any kind at the
command-line.
Yes, my oops. I had somehow asumed that you wanted to substract 3 from some value named "chuck". I apologise and blame a lack of coffee.
Vool! That's also something I would like to see: documentation on all
features in the language!
Yes, we would all like this, I think. At least we have a WiKi page where everybody can post additions, remarks and requests which should at least decrease the strain on maintaining the manual. I believe Adam Tindale was the last to be semi-officially in charge of the manual but other things took his time. I'd volunteer but I'd need a proofreader as I'm not a native English speaker and I still don't speak any Latex at all (the manual is done in Latex)
At least most things can be found by searching the list archives and the manual isn't *that* out of date. Aside from the latest greatest stuff this matter might be one of the worst missing bits.
dur => blackhole would be exactly like SinOsc => blackhole, but with
time. When you, for example, chuck second into blackhole, the shred will
forward 1 second in it's own timeline (A bit like the -s otion, if I
recall).
I'm still not sure exactly how this would be different. What would happen to playing Ugens that would be in the shred? Would those keep computing?
Example:
It could be used for plotting numbers over time. If you had two
envelopes that ascending from 10 and 15 up to 88 and 100, you could add
their value()s to their respective array of floats, round() the floats
to ints. Then, in a for loop, you have the computer play a random
midi-note between min[i] and max[i]. Congratulations! You got a
solo-playing computer!
(Sure, I realise that you could do this very task in other ways...)
Yes, chucking time to now would do here, I think. Maybe you could compare how this would be done now to what you propose in some chuck code and some pseudo-code?
Kas.