On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:02:57PM -0300, Vilson Vieira wrote:
We can even use Emscripten to convert an entire C/C++ codebase to JavaScript:
While I find the choices made in ChucK that lead to the relatively high cpu usage quite defensible, I think those make ChucK a bad candidate for such antics... What I'd do if I were motivated; Create a custom build of ChucK; focussed on livecoding so no hid, no audio in, etc. Harden it by disabling stuff that writes to the disk to protect your server and also make sure it can only read from a given directory. Probably also limit the amount of memory a shred or user can allocate. Have this accept scripts from a editor on your site. Stream the result using some online radio streamer and have this available on the same page as the editor. Add a second field for chat. That way you keep client-side CPU usage way down, putting it in the reach of devices like netbooks and smartphones. For bonus points; pre-load a public class to act as a shared clock event and have a version of the "busses" trick to share audio, for example so I can generate some sound and send it to your bus so you can treat it before we all hear it. You may also need some custom stuff to make sure the result of failed attempts at compiling code only ends up with the person writing the code. That'd be fun but personally I'd wait a bit and hope the current situation where many simple syntax errors lead to full-on seg-faulting clears up a bit. Yours, Kas.