This seems to be similar to the comma operator in C, which lets you use multiple comma-separated sub-expressions in a context where only a single expression is allowed. An expression using the comma operator evaluates to the value of the last sub-expression. Note that the comma operator is very different from how && works. -Jukka On Jun 28, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Kassen wrote:
Dear list,
Consider the following; =============== if( 1 , 0) { <<<"false?">>>; }
if( 1 , 1) { <<<"true?">>>; } =============
I think this isn't according to the language specs but it runs just fine. It seems that the comma equates to "&&"? it's not problematic in the slightest but it's not according to the specs either, I think, and a bit confusing.
What's up here?
Yours, Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users