29 Dec
2012
29 Dec
'12
1:27 p.m.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 07:12:07PM +0100, Stefan Blixt wrote:
So while they may not have a whole lot of use as such, I'd say that strings can be viewed as classes, and more crucially they are objects -
Yes, I now have to agree with you. This seems to have changed or maybe the old and frankly confusing situation has been cleared up a bit. Arguably they were behaving more like classes without any member functions than like primitives in the past anyway, but this seems fairly clear cut. Sadly that doesn't yet give us a way of pulling them apart at any other point than spaces, but it's a start. Good work! Kas.