[chuck-users] comma is and? undocumented feature

Dear list, Consider the following; =============== if( 1 , 0) { <<<"false?">>>; } if( 1 , 1) { <<<"true?">>>; } ============= I think this isn't according to the language specs but it runs just fine. It seems that the comma equates to "&&"? it's not problematic in the slightest but it's not according to the specs either, I think, and a bit confusing. What's up here? Yours, Kas.