Kassen wrote:
and you now also want to go "ADSR e => f.pfreq;" (or something similar) like a patch cable, right?
Exactly! I still don't see why this wouldn't be possible within the current conventions. I admit that I'm comming from another way of thinking, but who isn't :-) So allow me to think as I'm used to for a minute. So if I have a ADSR sonnected to a blackhole, it will generate samples when time passes, right? Normally an adsr scales an AC signal. If it input a DC of say 1 (could be hacked with a slooow sqr) to an ADSR it should scale thi according to it's settings. An it should do so in free-wheeling time (between chuck to now), right? Al that is needed is that I can connect this output to something like f.pfreq, and I would have a free-wheeling, simple to grasp, CPU-eater (updated at sample rate). Simple? yes. Flexible? Not that much. Newbie/Nord-Modular-Moogie friendly? Very. Elegant? In it's own way, yes. Sufficient? For basic stuff; yes, for the rest; no. Sorry for bringing this pragmatic garbage into the beautiful world of chuck :-) -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk | quartet: http://www.anagrammer.dk http://www.atte.dk/gps | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions