Mark,<br><br>I read your PDF and listened to the recordings. I also glanced over most of the code (I&#39;m sure I&#39;m still missing things there). This looks very promising to me; it&#39;s clear that the TOSC version is a big improvement and it&#39;s good that the exact nature of the issue with the wireless network is now clear. It strikes me that you are doing this research into syncing in a especially challenging environment so that should mean the solutions you find should work in a majority of cases.<br>
<br>I thought it quite inventive to emulate the things we are missing -at the moment- in ChucK (time stamps for OSC bundles as use of networked clocks through reading the system&#39;s clock) in ChucK itself; it&#39;s a nice reminder of what we already have and how powerful it is.<br>
<br>If I can/should give some critique; I was momentarily confused as from your PDF it looked like your &quot;TOSC&quot; version was based on &quot;OSC with timestamps added&quot;, which would be a slightly odd thing as OSC already has timestamps. What we have here (unless I&#39;m gravely mistaken) is instead ChucK&#39;s OSC implementation plus time-stamps readable to your use of it here. This ambiguity isn&#39;t very relevant for the topic of your research here but it is quite relevant from a perspective of compatibility and pointing this out might save confusion (I&#39;m not sure what the intended audience of that text is though, maybe this isn&#39;t relevant).<br>
<br>Overall these are some very promising results; it&#39;s looking like this will be a great year for synced live performance.<br><br>Thanks for the update,<br>Kas.<br>