I think reproduction would even be better facilitated by having to instance a randomizer before using it. If you made a sound based on random values and you want to add stuff, today there is a risk that the new stuff will mess up the old stuff, stealing values from the random sequence. If each thing has its own randomizer, you don't have this problem.

/Stefan

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Hans Aberg <haberg-1@telia.com> wrote:

On 11 Sep 2010, at 22:37, Stefan Blixt wrote:

Sorry if I'm just acting like my head is made of wood, but 1: why would anyone want to reproduce a chuck program sample-accurately?

One application is if one is experimenting with different parameters in combination with randomizers to produce different kinds of sounds, and then want to select a cool combination. With THX Deep Note they did not do so, resulting only having the recording.

http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2005/05/tiny-music-makers-pt-3-thx-sound.html

_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

--
Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!