That is unfortunate. I use chuck on 64studio (the 32bit version) and
it's actually quite stable and quite fast on that optimized kernel
that Free has built. I imagine a 64bit chuck would be nothing short
of amazing.
-mike
--
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Oliver Oli <oliver.oli+0815@gmail.com> wrote:
> this is really sad news for me. i just tried to compile chuck on 64studio.
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear list (and devs/ admins),
>>
>> The ChucK download page ( http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/release/ ) doesn't
>> mention that on Linux ChucK requires a 32 bit system (and not 64, right
>> now).
>>
>> I strongly suspect this to be the cause of confusion/segfaulting here;
>> http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26414
>>
>> (though I may be wrong)
>>
>> I would recommend putting this "on the packaging" so we can go on to new and
>> innovative ways of seg-faulting and being confused.
>>
>> In case I'm wrong; do we have a Fedora-expert who might be able to help
>> Flies there?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Kas.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
http://semiotech.org
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users