Hi Tomasz:

I enthusiastically second Andy's thanks to everyone who contributed to the manual, and to you for helping focus those efforts.

But Andy makes a good point.  For example, I'm not ready to become an editor.  But I have specific comments[*] that might be useful the next time someone takes a pass over a chapter in the manual.  Right now, my comments reside only in my head -- it would be good to have a place to present them for consideration in future edits.

- Rob

[*] Did you know that most unit generators don't describe the effect of chucking to their inputs?  

On 9 Jan 2010, at 10:23, Tomasz Kaye's brain wrote:

Hi Andy, 

The best thing to do is probably to fix the problems by editing the FLOSS version of the manual yourself (you'll need to get an account at FLOSS manuals).

Each chapter has a discussion page too, which could be used to ask/suggest things, though you'd probably get a better response by asking the list directly.

http://en.flossmanuals.net/bin/view/ChucK/WebHome

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Andrew Turley <aturley@acm.org> wrote:
I haven't found anything that "officially" describes how to suggest
changes to the manual. I've spotted a few things that I think should
be fixed, or at least discussed. At least one of them is an actual
error, while others are suggestions for how certain sections might be
improved.

Having said that, I would like to thank everyone who contributed to
the manual. It looks very useful, and seems to be off to a great
start.

andy
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users