13 Jul
2012
13 Jul
'12
2:43 p.m.
On 13 July 2012 20:17, George Locke
sweet. guess i might've figured that one out on my own...
I understand the problem. Like this I have been using it for quite a while, but the need for the extra Step, unless it sets some sort of variable scaling, feels a bit counter-intuitive. I seem to remember it was Perry who first proposed that Envelope without any input should assume a input of 1. That would bring it more closely in line with similar objects in other systems. There is also no problem with asking questions if you looked around a bit; the documentation is a bit scattered. Happy ChucKing, Kas.