well, that would probably be easy enough to hack in. but i don't want to wade into sf writing; did that many times years ago...


Excuse my ignorance, but isn't that why we have a library that will deal with writing out soundfiles for us? If it weren't for this http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/ I might have risen to the challenge of doing it in ChucK. I think that's possible, but I'm also in the process of learning Scheme and on a deadline. Doing it "manually" in ChucK seems possible but not that efficient in either terms of CPU or used hours.
 
i guess i figgered i was just being stupid, and there was an obvious way to do this that i was missing, so this is paradoxically gratifying and annoying.

I can completely understand this.
 
thanks? ;--}


Maybe? I'm only semi-formally in charge of navigating The Mess, not of The Mess itself. I propose we move on to stage 2 of any ChucKist issue which -as I remember it- is "blaming Ge" ;¬).

Clearly a feature is missing.

That said; I could see advantages to building this into LiSa in the long term. Some audio file formats consist of both wave data and loop points, much like LiSa. That could mean advantages to exporting straight from LiSa, even though I feel that our cutest UGen is far more interesting with regard to looping than traditional formats and samplers are.

Yours,
Kas.