Re: [chuck-users] ChucK compilation error (still, again?) -- similar to the Ubuntu GCC 4.3 problem

Yeah, that was advertised as the big 10.6 changeover, so I probably should have thought about it. How do I specify the 32-bit compile? Aside: Isn't Ubuntu 64-bit as well? I know very little about Linux, aside from that we share a command line. Thanks, Roger. Andrew On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:

Losing precision casting from a void * to a typedef'ed reference type suggests that you're compiling for a 64-bit pointer.  A quick google finds:

 "Snow Leopard supports 64-bit computing more pervasively than any other Apple OS to ..."

Maybe you need to specify a 32-bit compile explicitly?

-- rec --

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Andrew C. Smith wrote:

...

Hey all,

So, I just upgraded to Snow Leopard (anyone else? I feel like the list's guinea pig here) and now I'm getting awful compilation errors. "gcc" gives me 4.2.1, as does g++, so it's not the exact same as the 4.3 problem from the forum.

Before, I could download the CVS and compile straight-through, but now I get this:

$ make osx make -f makefile.osx gcc -D__MACOSX_CORE__ -c -O3 rtmidi.cpp rtmidi.cpp: In function ‘int get_device_name(SInt32, char*, int)’: rtmidi.cpp:295: error: cannot convert ‘void**’ to ‘MIDIObjectRef*’ for argument ‘2’ to ‘OSStatus MIDIObjectFindByUniqueID(MIDIUniqueID, MIDIObjectRef*, MIDIObjectType*)’ rtmidi.cpp:304: error: cast from ‘void*’ to ‘MIDIDeviceRef’ loses precision rtmidi.cpp:306: error: cast from ‘void*’ to ‘MIDIEntityRef’ loses precision rtmidi.cpp:312: error: cast from ‘void*’ to ‘MIDIEndpointRef’ loses precision rtmidi.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void RtMidiIn::openPort(unsigned int)’: rtmidi.cpp:521: warning: NULL used in arithmetic rtmidi.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void RtMidiOut::openPort(unsigned int)’: rtmidi.cpp:692: warning: NULL used in arithmetic make[1]: *** [rtmidi.o] Error 1 make: [osx] Error 2 (ignored)

I have XCode 3.2, which came with gcc 4.2.1. The only reason I've started with the compilation thing lately is because I wanted to check out UGens and things--purely exploratory. I have a fully-compiled version of the mini around, so I can still ChucK, but this is definitely bothering me. Any ideas?

Andrew _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users