Re: [chuck-users] is there a way of doing "callbacks" ( i.e. passing function as argument to be called later ) ?

Hi All, Henrique, I highly encourage you to take a deep look at Michael Heuer's LiCK library. There are some great things in there that take advantage of a functional paradigm in a generally functional-unfriendly language. And while we're talking about functional style and other nerdery, I submit for your consideration my attempt to implement a Closure in Chuck to avoid overmuch global state. This should appeal to you JavaScript geeks out there as well. It's influenced by ideas in LiCK. And while it's a bit harder to read than your traditional Chuckian style, it's the most bang-for-buck (in terms of lines of code) I could get out of Chuck in a short session. Comments most welcome. Enjoy! -Mike http://michaelclemow.com http://semiotech.org On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Robert Poor wrote:

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:

...

You might be able to hack [eval] by writing to a temp file and Machine.add'ing it.

That is sooo deliciously nasty, and I don't see why it couldn't work. I wish I'd thought of it. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users