2 May
2006
2 May
'06
7:10 p.m.
On May 3, 2006, at 12:58 AM, Perry R Cook wrote:
OK, here's the deal with that original code.
s1 @=> a[counter] => dac;
The first Chuck does assignment (replaces that member of the array with s1. The 2nd Chuck connects it to the dac. The @ part of the operator signifies assignment. So it's all legal, but maybe confusing.
I understand @ as "reference to". Same as & in C. Is this the correct way of understanding it?