2009/12/24 Tomasz Kaye's brain
<tomasz.brain@gmail.com>
@Kassen I think you've been maintaining the wiki bug list right?
I seem to remember Ge started the page, at least it was a new initiative in tracking bugs and a attempt at voting on what was urgent. I think this was in the days when Ge was working on his thesis. But yes, I tried to keep it up to date and encouraged it's use.
What do you think about moving it to lighthouse? (or perhaps a different issue tracking system).
I would like to have issue tracking. I'd like to have a clear way of reporting bugs, of getting them confirmed as such (or explained why this would be proper behaviour). I think it's especially important for people to be able to see what are "known issues", considering the insecurities and uncertainties that can come with starting out with text-based code (and ChucK is that for many users). I think it's good for people who report issues to know somebody took them up (see how Dan treats issues in LiSa) and I think it could help lead to a more distributed developer eco-system to know what issues are open, especially when combined with a way of pushing fixes in (see Tom's currently unofficial fix to CNoise). I think scratching off bugs with releases gives a sense of progress. Such a system might also help structure communication amongst the current DEV's.
All of these would be great to have, not just in a technological sense or for musical productivity but also socially. I believe we can do better than the WiKi there and that the proposed system is likely better. I don't have a real opinion on what system would be best for this and I don't think anything that the DEV's aren't happy with would make practical sense.
I presumptuously went ahead and copied over all the outstanding bugs from the wiki page at http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Bugs/Release to the lighthouse system (adding links to archived list threads where appropriate) http://chuckissues.lighthouseapp.com This gives a clearer impression of how the system looks when running.
makes perfect sense to me.
What I dislike about the wiki option is that it currently requires non-members to request a user with an account on the CS wiki to ask a member of CS Staff to create an account.
It does? I can't remember that from creating my own. I do know there is a significant spam problem there.
That's a significant barrier to reporting bugs imo. ( http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&returnto=Main_Page ) At least, It's prevented me from filing them on the wiki so far. By contrast anyone can register with lighthouse and post stuff there. Hopefully a system like lighthouse would be easier to maintain, and to keep manageable, than text on a wiki page too.
Yes, I agree, but (as you noted) the advantage of the wiki is that it attempts (at least) to keep all things ChucKist in a single spot. We already have a site, a list, a wiki, a forum, a irc chatroom (I think?) a online radio show, a FaceBook group, there is likely more. This is bewildering to new users, who are precisely the kind of people who will try unusual things and so in a perfect position to find bugs. Those interests need not necessarily be in conflict but they are there and currently the wiki at least attempts to address those.
More thoughts, lighthouse support/dissent welcome!
Merry christmas all!
Merry ChucKmas to all! May you all temporarily turn your ChucK operators sideways to look (vaguely) like a needle tree. I find this time of the year lends itself wonderfully to contemplating the meaning (if any) of symbols which is of course quite useful for programmers.
/\
||Kas.