Hi Kas

Yes, I speak Spanish, and with great difficult, English. The Spanish comments are not important.
And yes, the seg-fault menssage is a linux menssage, not a ChucK menssage (if I understood what you say).

Thanks you
Lucas


2008/4/18, Kassen <signal.automatique@gmail.com>:
On 19/04/2008, lucas samaruga <samarugalucas@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi list

Hi Lucas!
 

I'm working with ChucK in a musical project,

Yay! A wise choice too, much better then ChucK for database management, probably. :¬)
 

and I have a problem with the code.
This code generates 3 different error menssages in my machine
(running chuck-alsa on linux), depending on the amount of
components in an array.

I just glanced over it but I suspect at least issue 2) is one of the (new?) issues where (un)certain problems of resolving type on arrays (maybe especially when using functions) leads to seg-faults.

There's good news in that Ge is looking into this and I found so far that in all cases where I ran into this (if it's the same thing) so far we can write around it.

Another thing worth mentioning is that ChucK shouldn't seg-fault at all. Maybe it should kill the shred when the error happens or give a error at compilation but not seg-fault and quite working altogether.

It's rather late here and your comments are in a language I don't speak (I think Spanish?) so I hope you'll excuse me if I don't have a solution right away but that issue is likely to be fixed relatively soon and I rate suspect we could work around it as well. Just not right now :¬)


 

Yours,
Kas.

_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users