tor 2007-11-01 klockan 12:40 +0100 skrev eduard aylon:
I think other vim users should say something about this. In my opinion if you get use to and like a specific syntax coloring it is difficult to be comfortable again with a different one. So if yours was the one on the wiki, probably many others are using it. If I had known (it's my fault for not checking it) that someone was updating it, I would have worked on that. So I think we should wait for others to speak out.
True, true, but I seriously doubt that there is any more vim users on the list (well, not more than 3, anyway).
Really? well, then many don't know what they are missing :-)
Well, it -at least- seems like most people use miniAudicle. I don't even think there are many people using Emacs.
I'm attaching a new version of the one you sent in your first post, but with added support for the new "<--"-comments (line 126 and 129),
didn't know you can use <-- to write comments.
It's pretty new (as of 1.2.1.0).
Oh, yes. I see that now in the VERSION file.
Okay, we seems to have pretty different views on how it should look. I propose that we keep both files on the wiki - it would be a shame if any of them were lost. I'll update mine with the things I like in your ck.vim, and you can do what you want with yours
ok, then.
This is probably better than arguing about how the highlighting should work. Gasten