there's no way to use this to ramp an arbitrary variable, like the frequency of a SinOsc, for example, is there?  Cause I do stuff like this and find it kinda annoying:

SinOsc s => dac;

110 => float initial => s.freq;

fun void ramp() {

    880 => float final;

    1::ms => dur res;

    500::ms => dur width;

    (final - initial) / (width / res) => float delta;

    now => time start;

    while(now < start + width) {

        res => now;

        s.freq() + delta => s.freq;

    }

}

spork ~ ramp();

1::second => now;

On Friday, July 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Kassen wrote:

On 13 July 2012 20:17, George Locke <george.locke.maxmsp@gmail.com> wrote:

sweet. guess i might've figured that one out on my own...

I understand the problem.

Like this I have been using it for quite a while, but the need for the

extra Step, unless it sets some sort of variable scaling, feels a bit

counter-intuitive. I seem to remember it was Perry who first proposed

that Envelope without any input should assume a input of 1. That would

bring it more closely in line with similar objects in other systems.

There is also no problem with asking questions if you looked around a

bit; the documentation is a bit scattered.

Happy ChucKing,

Kas.

_______________________________________________

chuck-users mailing list

chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu

https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users